🤖 AI Tools

AI Model Comparison

Compare GPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek side by side — pricing, context windows, output limits and capabilities. Find the right model for your task and budget.

Advertisement
⚔️
Head-to-Head Comparison

Pick any two models to compare them directly. The better value in each row is highlighted in green — cheaper price, larger context, longer output.

VS
Specs and prices verified June 2026 from provider documentation. AI models and pricing change frequently — confirm current details on the official OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google pages before relying on them.
Advertisement
📊
All Models Compared

Every major model in one place. Filter by provider, then sort to find the cheapest, the largest context window, or the best fit at a glance.

Model Input $/1M Output $/1M Context Max Out VisionReasonToolsBest For
Vision = image input · Reason = extended reasoning/thinking · Tools = function calling / tool use. Context and max-output are in tokens (K = thousand, M = million).
Advertisement

What is the AI Model Comparison Tool?

This AI model comparison tool puts the leading large language models — OpenAI's GPT, Anthropic's Claude, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek — side by side, so you can compare their pricing, context windows, output limits, and capabilities in one place. With new models launching constantly and prices varying enormously, choosing the right one for your project, budget, or task is genuinely hard. This tool makes it simple: compare any two models head to head, or sort and filter the full table to find the cheapest option, the biggest context window, or the best all-round fit.

Whether you're a developer picking a model for an app, a business comparing API costs, or just trying to understand how GPT, Claude, and Gemini stack up, this gives you the facts that matter without the marketing.

How to Use This Comparison

For a direct matchup, use the head-to-head picker: choose two models and the better value in each row is highlighted — cheaper price, larger context window, longer maximum output. For the big picture, use the full table: tap the provider buttons to filter to one company, and sort to rank models by input price, output price, or context size.

GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: The Big Three

The three leading providers each have strengths. OpenAI's GPT models are the most widely adopted, with strong general performance and a huge ecosystem. Anthropic's Claude models are favoured for coding, long-context work, and careful reasoning. Google's Gemini models offer enormous context windows, native multimodal support, and some of the lowest prices through their Flash tier. There's no single "best" — the right choice depends on your specific task, budget, and whether you need vision, reasoning, or massive context.

💡 Don't default everything to the flagship. Most production workloads run fine on a mid-tier or budget model. A common, cost-effective pattern is to route the bulk of traffic to a cheap model (like Gemini Flash-Lite, GPT-4o mini, or Claude Haiku) and escalate only the hardest requests to a flagship. That can cut your bill by 90% with little quality loss.

Understanding Pricing

All API pricing is per million tokens, billed separately for input (what you send) and output (what the model generates). Output almost always costs more — often three to five times the input rate. Prices range hugely: budget models like Gemini Flash-Lite cost around $0.10 per million input tokens, while flagships like GPT-5.5 or Claude Opus run $5 per million input and up to $30 per million output. For the same task, the cheapest and most expensive models can differ by 50x or more, which is why comparing matters.

What is a Context Window?

The context window is the maximum number of tokens a model can consider at once — its working memory. A larger window lets you feed in more: longer documents, entire codebases, or extended conversations. Modern flagships have reached around 1 million tokens (roughly 750,000 words), enough for several full books at once. If you work with large documents or codebases, context window is a key differentiator. Note that some models charge a premium for very long prompts above a threshold.

What is Maximum Output?

Separate from the context window, maximum output is the longest response a model can produce in a single call — typically tens of thousands of tokens. This matters when you need the model to generate long content: detailed reports, large code files, or extensive translations. A model can have a huge context window but a smaller output cap, so if you need long generations, check this figure specifically rather than assuming the context size applies to output.

Model Capabilities Explained

  • Vision (multimodal): the model can accept images as input — for analysing photos, screenshots, charts, or documents.
  • Reasoning: extended "thinking" before answering, improving performance on complex maths, logic, and coding (at the cost of more tokens).
  • Tools / function calling: the model can call external functions and APIs, essential for agents and integrations.
  • Free tier: some providers (notably Google) offer limited free usage, useful for prototyping.

Which AI Model Should You Choose?

Match the model to the job. For simple, high-volume tasks (classification, extraction, routing), a budget model gives the best value. For general production work, a balanced mid-tier model like Claude Sonnet, GPT-5.4, or Gemini Flash offers the best price-to-quality ratio. For the hardest tasks (complex coding, deep reasoning, agentic workflows), a flagship justifies its premium. If you need huge context, favour Gemini or the 1M-token flagships; if you need vision, check the capability column; if budget is everything, sort by input price and start at the top.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best AI model in 2026?
There's no single best — it depends on your needs. For the hardest coding and reasoning, flagship models like GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 lead. For balanced everyday use, Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini Flash offer excellent value. For cheap high-volume work, budget models like Gemini Flash-Lite and GPT-4o mini win. Use the comparison above to match a model to your specific task and budget.
Is GPT or Claude better?
Both are top-tier and trade blows. GPT models have the largest ecosystem and strong all-round performance; Claude models are often preferred for coding, long-context understanding, and careful reasoning. The "better" one depends on your use case. Compare them head-to-head above on price, context, and capabilities to see which fits your needs — many teams use both for different tasks.
Which AI model is cheapest?
Budget models are dramatically cheaper than flagships. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (around $0.10/$0.40 per million tokens), GPT-4o mini ($0.15/$0.60), and DeepSeek ($0.14/$0.28) are among the lowest-cost options. Sort the table above by input price to rank every model from cheapest to most expensive for a clear picture.
Which model has the largest context window?
Several flagship models now offer around 1 million tokens of context, including Gemini Pro, the GPT-5 series, and Claude's top models — roughly 750,000 words, enough for entire codebases or several books. Sort the table by context to compare. If your work involves very large documents, this is one of the most important specs to check.
What's the difference between input and output pricing?
Input tokens are what you send (your prompt, context, documents); output tokens are what the model generates. Output is almost always more expensive — typically three to five times the input rate — because generating text is more computationally demanding. This means response length often drives your bill more than prompt length, so capping output is a key cost lever.
Do any AI models have a free tier?
Yes — Google's Gemini offers a free tier on its Flash models (with rate limits), useful for prototyping and low-volume use. Most other providers don't offer ongoing free API tiers, though some give trial credits to new accounts. The capability column notes which models include free access. Always check the provider's current terms.
How often does this comparison update?
The data was verified in June 2026, but AI moves fast — new models launch and prices change regularly. We refresh the figures periodically, but for contracts or production decisions, always confirm the latest details on the official OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google pricing and documentation pages. This tool is for comparison and guidance.
Can I use this to estimate my costs?
This tool shows the per-token rates to compare models. To calculate your actual spend based on your token usage and request volume, pair it with an LLM API cost calculator — pick your model here, then plug the rates into the cost calculator for a precise monthly estimate. The two tools work together.
Advertisement

Scroll to Top